The other day, I was reading a thread on the Warrior Forum (a forum for internet marketing) and I came across a discussion of mailing lists that brought some interesting things to light.
If you’re a reader of this blog, you know how often I mention the fact that you need to be collecting simple contact information from your visitors, using autoresponders to begin building a relationship and maintaining contact using the autoresponder and broadcast mailings.
There has been a lot of debate over the merits of single opt-in and double opt-in mailing lists. The idea of a double opt-in list is simple. The subscriber has to confirm their subscription before they are added to the list.
This is primarily to prevent automated sign-ups, malicious sign-ups (where a person subscribes someone else to one or more lists). It also sends a signal to the subscribers that they are dealing with an ethical marketer who is taking steps to prevent such things.
The most common complaint I hear from list owners about double opt-in lists is that a large percentage of their subscribers never confirm. And that would seem to be a problem. Don’t you want to reach EVERYONE who takes the time to sign up for your list?
Short answer - No, you don’t.
There are reasons why people don’t confirm. Some of them don’t receive the confirmation email. Some of them change their mind. Some of them were subscribed by someone else. Let’s take these one at a time.
Some of them don’t receive the confirmation message.
OK, you’ve put a really clear message on the subscribe thank you page that explains what they need to do to confirm their subscription. But you still only get 50% of them to confirm. What happened? Maybe some of them didn’t get the confirmation email. What do you do about them? Well, nothing. If they didn’t get your confirmation message, they obviously didn’t make the effort to whitelist you. So even if your list were single opt-in, they wouldn’t be getting your messages either.
Some of them change their mind.
Buyer regret happens even with email list sign-ups. And if you offer an “ethical bribe,” they may be tempted to use a phony email address just to get what you are offering. By making them confirm, you weed out the phony emails and those that want your gift, but not your mailings or newsletter.
Some of them were subscribed by someone else.
This is more common than your think. It’s not just malicious subscriptions that sign up others. How about so called “tell-a-friend” scripts that keep emails in a back-end database for later use. Tell your friend and they are signed up. If the list is single opt-in, they are signed up unwillingly. I’ve stopped using “tell-a-friend” scripts because my friends are more important than some unscrupulous emailers. If I want a friend to see a website, I can email them the URL. Don’t use these things - too many of them are poison. Worst of all, I have seen these scripts mail to the “friends” from the original friends email address. Nice - spam them and blame it on the person naive enough to give their friends email addresses to you.
And folks, commercial email sent to someone who didn’t request it is spam, plain and simple, regardless of who is the sender.
Single opt-in pitfalls
I use single opt-in on a few of my lists. Generally they are lists of current or past customers, members of membership sites, etc. Lists that can be signed up for on a web form are not good single opt-in candidates.
Too many list owners put way too much stock in the size of their list. It is like pissing on trees - “my list is bigger than your list.” Tests by several marketers have indicated that a properly maintained double opt-in list is far more productive than a single opt-in list. I didn’t use the term “well maintained single opt-in list” because there is no such thing. When a list owner puts more stock in numbers than in the quality of the subscriber, their credibility takes a hit. Subscribers have less respect for the list and it’s owner making them that more likely to not think twice about filtering the email into limbo or clicking their “spam” button.
You’ve all read about how ISPs are penalizing single opt-in list owners by making their mail less deliverable than double opt-in mails. They are also beginning to track such things as open rate and click-throughs to determine if email from certain sender has any value to their customers. If there are few opens or clicks and the “spam” button gets clicked a few times, what do you think is going to happen that domain’s emails?
Email lists area all about deliverability. Track your open rate. If it is extremely low, you’ve got a problem. Not everyone reads every mail. But if I had an open rate of 5%, 10% or 15%, I’d be concerned.
One more thing that has turned up in some folks testing. A lot of the single opt-in subscribers who are opening the mail (thus counting in your open rate stat) are also hitting the “spam” button instead of delete. They just highlight a bunch of emails and click, spam. It’s that respect thing again. It’s free and easy, so it has less value.
Do your subscribers respect you?
So once again, it all goes to credibility. If you are taking steps to show that you are a credible source of information, running a credible email list is an important part.
Another important part of keeping your list deliverable in proper maintainence. Hard bounces and phony addresses need to be cleaned off the list. The software I use (AutoResponse Plus) and most services, such as aWeber limit the number of tries the system will make to an address. Removing them is then a simple process.
It’s harder to track those who are on your list, but are inactive. Some people send out an email threatening to remove subscribers who don’t take some action. I don’t like the idea of threatening subscribers, but if you have a single opt-in list, it may the only way of eliminating inactive subscribers who can damage your ability to deliver email to others.
This is always a hot issue, so if you have something you agree or disagree with, or simply have something to add to this, your comments are always welcome.